MGT Leadership and Ethics Unit 2 IP Research Paper

MGT Leadership and morality Unit 2 IP - Research Paper ExampleAn effective leader exhibits a conspiracy of both in-born traits and skills acquired through experience and biological background. Leadership style is the combination of traits, skills and behaviours leaders use as they interact with the followers. (Lussier and Archua, 2010) thus the individual characteristics and traits of the leader depend on two computes Heredity and Environment. The heredity factor includes the generic composition of the leader along with his biological background. However environment includes the culture, religion, family, location and education etc. The interaction between heredity genes and the environmental forces help build up the leaders characters. The differences in the traits possess by the leaders arise from the demographics, values, personality and skill. Individual behaviour is determined to a great consummation by internal elements such as attitudes, personality, perceptions, and abi lity. (Lewis & Goodman et al., 2007) The demographics of the leader includes his background, age and other physical attributes and whereabouts, the values atomic number 18 the long lasting preferences and beliefs, and personality is what makes the leader unique showcasing the different physical and psychological characteristics. Lastly the all-important(a) individual characteristic is the aptitude of the leader, the natural talent of doing something both mentally and physically. Executives who goat effectively focalisation on others emerge as natural leaders regardless of organizational or social rank. (Goleman, 2013) This aptitude cannot be enforced on anyone however skills can be acquired through training. A leader cannot be made through training however new skills can be taught for better and effective lead. frankincense the conventional theories of leadership involve the trait and behavioural theories that focus on the traits as well as the acquired behaviour of the leader also mentioned in the above discussion. The contingency theory brings in the situation and its characteristics into the leadership equation. The test of leadership depends upon the nature of the situation and the success depends upon how well the leader manages the situation at hand. The advocator and influence theory that will become the main focus of this discussion, focus on the different ways the leaders use their power in order to get things done. All these believes and theories are reflected in the leadership model where the leader has to deal with the personal front involving his set of his abilities and traits, the group where he manages the organization and at long last the public involving the environment and the stakeholders of the leaders organization. The power of the leader in an organization is vast (see Appendix). A CEO of a large organization has the power to influence the board of directors. He is the sole discover that can change the philosophy of the entire o rganization. The power of the CEO is to decide how much input he wants from the subordinates and how stringent or relaxed the work hierarchy should be. His expertise in the organization is supposedly more enriched as compared to other employees in the organization. It is this knowledge and official responsibility that gives the CEO the power to control. He is the one who can turn a bad situation to a positive through his influence tactics. For example, Proctor and hazard (P&G) the consumer